<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>MatriSmsBlog &#187; consumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.matrisms.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=consumer" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.matrisms.com</link>
	<description>Find your match with us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:22:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>CLIENT’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION IS SACROSANCT</title>
		<link>http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=3632</link>
		<comments>http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=3632#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pankaj]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariff card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=3632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; In a number of judgments in recent years, the apex consumer court has censured service providers for violating the consumer’s right to information, thereby giving a fillip to one of the most important rights of consumers. Let me begin with the latest order, decided on july26, pertaining to the aviation sector. The National Consumer [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.matrisms.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3632</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://i0.wp.com/blog.matrisms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/images8.jpg?resize=217%2C232" length="4998" type="image/jpg" /><media:content url="http://i0.wp.com/blog.matrisms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/images8.jpg?resize=217%2C232" width="217" height="232" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLIENT’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION IS SACROSANCT</title>
		<link>http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=3367</link>
		<comments>http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=3367#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[my-matrimonial.com]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer court forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=3367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a number of judgments in recent years, the apex consumer court has censured service providers for violating the consumer’s right to information, thereby giving a fillip to one of the most important rights of consumers.Let me begin with the latest order, decided on july26, pertaining to the aviation sactor. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.matrisms.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3367</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://i1.wp.com/blog.matrisms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/rti.jpg?resize=264%2C191" length="5387" type="image/jpg" /><media:content url="http://i1.wp.com/blog.matrisms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/rti.jpg?resize=264%2C191" width="264" height="191" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of breach of policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=1470</link>
		<comments>http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=1470#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neeraj]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social or current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambassador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life of insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matrisms.com/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the insurance policy conditions and the exclusion clauses carefully. Ensure that you don’t give any scope to the insurance company to repudiate your claim. When you take an insurance policy to cover your jewellery and some other valuables against theft, loss or damage. One of the policy conditions is that you should take all [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.matrisms.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1470</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://i0.wp.com/blog.matrisms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/insurance1.jpg?resize=194%2C260" length="6193" type="image/jpg" /><media:content url="http://i0.wp.com/blog.matrisms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/insurance1.jpg?resize=194%2C260" width="194" height="260" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
